On the first day of the new term, the Supreme Court announced that it will decline to hear a case involving Professor John Eastman’s emails sought by the January 6 Committee. Justice Thomas did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition filed by Eastman, one of his former clerks.
Read story here
On December 12, in a 3-0 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit a lower court order halting enforcement of provisions of the Big Beautiful Bill...
On December 8, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter, a case that arrived on appeal from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. This dispute...
This week, Landmark joined Professor Seth Barrett Tillman in defending President Trump from a violation of his constitutional right to a unanimous jury verdict. In the...
When the Framers of the Constitution designed the Executive Branch, they made the conscious decision to vest its power in a single person, the President. This decision...
On October 15, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Louisiana v. Callais, a consolidated case on direct appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Western...
On October 8, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections1, a case on whether federal candidates have standing to challenge...
On September 22, Landmark filed an extensive comment in support of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) “Reconsideration of the 2009 Endangerment Finding.” If...
On July 18, Landmark filed a brief in federal district court in National Education Association v. Department of Education, defending the Trump...
On Friday, June 27th, the Supreme Court issued a 6–3 ruling in Mahmoud v. Taylor, siding with parents who wanted to opt their children out of lessons centered...
On July 18, Landmark filed a brief in federal district court in National Education Association v. Department of Education, defending the Trump administration’s efforts...